IC Insp Gen’l Horowitz’s report, page 368-369: “…the (FISA) renewal applications…(item 11) Omitted information from Department attorney Bruce Ohr about Steele and his election reporting, including that ( 1) Steele’s reporting was going to Clinton’s presidential campaign and others, (2) Simpson was paying Steele to discuss his reporting with the media, and (3) Steele was “desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being the U.S. President””

(‘Simpson’ is one of the owners of FusionGPS; ‘Steele’ is author of the dirt dossier.)

Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and the DNC, through lawyers, were paying FusionGPS.

But, you know…no documentary evidence of bias…

RIGHT

So the IG report acknowledges that

• the FISA apps relied on the Steele dossier to justify spy warrants;
• the FISA apps were riddled with 51 violations that biased the process;
• Steele’s oppo-research employer FusionGPS paid him to talk it up with media…

…but ‘no documentary evidence of political bias’ existed?

Bogus FISA apps are ‘documents’.

The dirt-dossier is a ‘document’.

The author of the dirt-document being paid to talk to media is ‘documented’.

What are we missing here?

Horowitz exposed it today…he emphasized under Senate questioning the initiation of the Trump investigation had no documentary evidence of political bias motivation, but when the FISA abuses come into play, he said, that’s a different ‘challenging’ story.

Stay tuned.