When lies are needed to support an issue, is it really an issue?

Breitbart THEN: “Flashback: Adam Schiff Claimed ‘We Have Not Spoken Directly with the Whistleblower’” Washington Examiner NOW: “Adam Schiff needs to go”

Here’s the link to a video of Schiff’s lie.

Seems Schiff and staff met with the gossip-monger (whistleblower?) months before.

Got that? Committee chairman Schiff, conducting a ‘pre’ inquiry for impeachment, lied about meeting the author of hearsay allegations that are the reason for the ‘pre’ inquiry.

And we all remember this (as reported by the Washington Times): “Schiff called out for fabricating Ukraine call transcript in opening remarks”…opening remarks (at the hearing) where he ‘read from a call transcript’ but was a made-up blatant lie, that the President ‘demanded the Ukrainian leader make up dirt on Joe Biden, 7 times’.

Serious impeachment hearings procedurally start in the House Judiciary committee; the Democrats are starting this one in the Intel committee, so they can keep doors closed.

Wouldn’t you think anyone with solid cause for impeachment would want open doors?

Serious impeachment inquiries are voted to be conducted, which allows BOTH Parties to issue subpoenas; conducting a non-voted ‘pre’ inquiry format blocks Republicans.

Wouldn’t you want an opportunity to subpoena witnesses in your pre-trial hearings?

No HONEST Democrat should accept this unethical chicanery from their Party.

When you have to LIE, HIDE, and OBSTRUCT fair inquiries…is it really an inquiry?

Shouldn’t there be a necessarily competent effort to launch a ‘righteous’ impeachment?

Forget dishonesty…why would any Democrat vote for these incompetent people?