Want to smear someone without proof? That’s how it’s done.

The NY Times ran a smear article against Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh, using stories from women who can’t remember important details, with no supporting proof.

Now, an ex-executive editor of the NY Times is defending this yellow journalism, by stating ‘there’s no evidence’ that Brett Kavanaugh didn’t commit unfounded crimes.

How does one prove they didn’t do something, if time/place/actions aren’t remembered?

Our headline shows how it’s done…molesting a Down-Syndrome child is despicable.

We don’t say when or where it may have happened.

We don’t say if there were any witnesses.

We don’t say there’s any proof the molesting activity occurred.

Can NY Times editor Baquet prove he didn’t molest a 10-yr old Down Syndrome child?

This is what the Times is doing to Kavanaugh. Is turn-about fair play, Mr. Baquet?