Shouldn’t white descendants of those who fought to end slavery get reparations too?

Questions for the ‘reparations’ crowd of Democrat hopefuls…

Arguably half of the hundreds of thousands who died in the Civil War were fighting to end slavery…shouldn’t their descendants (including Betsy Ross’s) get reparations?

After all, those Civil War dead were against the institution, and gave all fighting it.

(Hey, Kaepernick…Betsy Ross was one of the first outspoken anti-slavery activists.)

Then there’s the little-discussed fact that some blacks fought for the South. Surely, if they fought to continue slavery, their descendants shouldn’t qualify for reparations?

Or, like so many other Democrat programs…is reparations just another crony sinkhole to funnel cash to their buddies…and scrape some off for themselves in the process?

(Consider questions about billions to Baltimore, Haiti, Puerto Rico et al…and, is it any surprise that in every case, it seems Democrat hands are in the big-$$ cookie jar?)

Reparations are an insult to the hundreds of thousands who fought to end slavery, and to justify it by claiming descendants are forced to live in better conditions is ludicrous.

(Don’t take our word for it – Google ‘African nation economies’ and see for yourself.)

BlueCollar has been outspoken against this crazy reparations ploy from the beginning.

But it doesn’t hurt to tweak the vote-whores using political expediency to push for it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *