Anonymous associates of anonymous sources close to the anonymous Mueller team members who spoke with them said it was glaringly clear Trump was innocent, and that AG Barr’s summary should have been more emphatic in his no-collusion summary.

See how easy it is?

We just destroyed the NY Times article alluding to a 3-tier anonymous-sources report alluding to their supposed frustration that Barr’s summary made Trump look good…

…by using a 3-tier anonymous sources rebuttal, and…

…NEITHER ARTICLE CAN BE REFUTED.

Here’s the meat of the NY Times article:

“Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations…”

Every group (underlined in above quote) is unidentified, therefore…anonymous.

‘Some’…’associates’…’government officials’…’others’…

3-tier? Unhh, try even 4-tier!

That’s the way it’s done, folks.