“Will Democrats finally admit the Obama DOJ and FBI lied to the FISA court?”

(Hint: Key word in that question is ‘Democrats’. Need we say more?)

Well, yeah…there’s always gonna be some claiming more needs to be said.

Okay…

There are three key elements necessary when documents are presented to support FISA surveillance warrants to spy on American citizens. As John Solomon noted “First, the FBI must present evidence to FISA judges that it has verified and that (it) comes from intelligence sources deemed reliable. Second, it must disclose any information that calls into question the credibility of its sources. Finally, it must disclose any evidence suggesting the innocence of its investigative targets.”

To this day, not one iota of proof substantiates the ‘dirt-dossier’ evidence given the FISA courts – it has not been verified, the author’s sources have not been identified (which means it’s unreliable, and the credibility of its sources are unknown), and exculpatory evidence suggesting the innocence of its investigative targets was not revealed.

But that didn’t stop the DOJ and FBI from their goal: to spy on Trump and his aides.

Now, go back to the first question in this post.

Question asked, question answered?

Maybe the real question should be – can Democrats be honest?

You decide.