All the talk of ‘it will cost $93 trillion’ aside, there’s an easier argument against the GND: it’s based on a lie – produced by computer models…and tweaked with ‘adjusted’ data.
- The ‘warming trend’ is based on data deceptively tweaked to reflect it;
- The Middle Ages saw warmer temperatures than exist today;
- The Carboniferous & Jurassic Periods had 4.5x-5x greater co2 levels.
And, surprise…the Earth is still here – as are we.
Animal/plant life flourished during the eras we note above. The sky isn’t falling. (We’d include human life, but Democrats’ infanticide inclinations show that’s not an issue.)
So, why talk ‘costs’? Arguing over mundane details gives credibility to their premise.
The Green New Deal is based on a lie that there’s an earth-ending threat otherwise. It takes just a moment to state, unequivocally, that Science refutes that FALSE threat.
Class dismissed.