Mueller’s indictment of Stone guts the premise of ‘collusion’

While the Left’s aflutter over Mueller’s indictment of Trump campaign aide Roger Stone, it seems they’re ignoring a key element of the indictment negating the ‘collusion’ meme.

First, we should understand he’s charged with lying to Congress, not Mueller.

More importantly, he’s charged with lying about his efforts to find out what damaging emails (or information) WikiLeaks may have had regarding the Clinton campaign.

(Count four of the indictment)

That’s huge, when one considers the ‘collusion’ premise is based on assertions that the Trump campaign was directly involved with ‘hacking’ of those emails: why would Stone be asking anyone to find out information that they’re already accused of having?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *