The Hill.com op-ed: “Regardless of how children enter our country we have a moral obligation to protect them” Seriously? Then why endanger them at all?

Begs the question: how is encouraging child endangerment, by enticing illegal aliens with a promise of sanctuary, not a part of that ‘moral obligation to protect them’?

(Don’t even get us started on enticement using their ‘moral obligation’ rhetoric.)

If the enticements weren’t there, families wouldn’t send their kids over 2000 miles.

This is typical Democrat strategy…

…create a crisis, then declare self-serving solutions for the crisis they created.