Difference between ‘plausible’ and ‘political’ plays out before our eyes

President Trump nominated Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court position July 09, 2018.

Any Democrat politician or Left-wing activist (yeah, we know, what’s the difference?) worth their salt would know that an FBI background check would follow a nomination.

And a claim of sexual assault (especially in the ears of a deep-state’er in the FBI ranks known for their hostility to ANYTHING Trump-related) would be vigorously checked.

Knowing: her past claims to a therapist involved a contradictory number of assailants (she blames bad therapist note-taking); she can’t remember when it happened; and she can’t remember where it happened…any reasoning person would expect to be doubted.

Alerting FBI in July demonstrates a plausible claim (however minimal) worth checking.

But, to WAIT until the 11th hour demonstrates a political gambit worth…nothing.

We know, we know…she’s a woman – but MORE importantly, Kavanaugh is (gasp) a Trump-nominee – which means her claim MUST be heard regardless of

  • the 36-years past since the (what amounts to) alleged teen-age groping,
  • the confusing number of assailants she says were involved,
  • the failure to tell anyone at the time,
  • the fact when it happened isn’t known,
  • the fact where it happened isn’t known,
  • the fact it wasn’t brought up in July when he was nominated…

…’cuz, hey…he’s a TRUMP/GOP nominee – which means it’s ALWAYS plausible.

(But don’t listen to BlueCollar…ask any honest cop how they’d handle such a claim.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *