Ssooo…some ‘wrongdoing’ is probe-worthy, but not when PROBER wrongdoing’s involved?

We believe a main reason for the ‘Russia’ hoax is to obscure their spying reality. Once Hillary unexpectedly lost, against their predictions, it’s been all about Damage Control.

Anyone confused over angst as Congressional Republicans probe unlawful acts that were performed by many Obama administration partisans in the FBI and DOJ?

Well, naturally the Left’s gone crazy…who do Republicans think they are? But…hey, Congress has oversight authority – we’ll try explaining what the Left’s reasoning entails.

To sum up, where there’s NO EVIDENCE, a probe over ‘wrongdoing’ is needed (‘cuz it’s Trump)…but if illegal chicanery of Democrats is exposed, a probe’s not appropriate.

‘Cuz…they’re Democrats.

See…it isn’t if wrongdoing can be proven – it’s WHO the wrongdoer is.

Those wrongfully ‘surveilling’ don’t want to show how they justified surveillance.

Okay – everybody got that?

Probes, with NO evidence of wrongdoing – OK (when a Republican’s the target)…but even when evidence EXISTS that the probers acted illegally – no need for oversight.

Class dismissed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *