Interesting – according to CA law, AG Becerra should not have been att’y gen’l…& shouldn’t be on Nov ballot

American Thinker article“California General Election Code 12503 says, “No person shall be eligible to the office of Attorney General unless he shall have been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the state for a period of at least five years immediately preceding his election or appointment to such office.”  As of the November 6, 2018 general election, Becerra will have only been reactivated as a practicing attorney for a period of one year, ten months and five days…” (u/l emphasis added)

Becerra’s not eligible for election, and he shouldn’t have been appointed, either.

“It appears to be impossible for a person to have been “admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the state” while the person was precluded from practicing law because of that person’s “inactive” status.” (emphasis added)

You would think – The Law’s The Law

…but then, when did the law ever stop Democrats?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *