When in doubt…maybe…look for the common (D)nominator?

A (D)emocrat president knew Russians were ‘meddling’ but did…nothing;

A (D)emocrat presidential campaign funded a Russian-sourced anti-Trump dirt dossier;

A (D)emocrat server ‘hacked’ by…unhhh, Russians?…went unanalyzed by the feds;

A (D)emocrat led intelligence community, curiously impotent, in the midst of it all;

A (D)emocrat scandal-plagued candidate gets thrashed at the polls;

A (D)emocrat hyped ‘Russia-collusion’ investigation then ensues.

What could POSSIBLY tie all these random factors together…?

And…

How could ANYONE possibly see such an investigation as a ‘witch-hunt’?

Maybe it’s not just coincidence that ‘deceitful’ starts with a…(D).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *