A (D)emocrat president knew Russians were ‘meddling’ but did…nothing;
A (D)emocrat presidential campaign funded a Russian-sourced anti-Trump dirt dossier;
A (D)emocrat server ‘hacked’ by…unhhh, Russians?…went unanalyzed by the feds;
A (D)emocrat led intelligence community, curiously impotent, in the midst of it all;
A (D)emocrat scandal-plagued candidate gets thrashed at the polls;
A (D)emocrat hyped ‘Russia-collusion’ investigation then ensues.
What could POSSIBLY tie all these random factors together…?
And…
How could ANYONE possibly see such an investigation as a ‘witch-hunt’?
Maybe it’s not just coincidence that ‘deceitful’ starts with a…(D).