Oct 31, 2016 NY Times headline…

“Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia“

But, wait – October, 2016? BEFORE the presidential election? How can this be?

Over the last 2 days, those listening to disingenuous whining of Democrats on Capitol Hill during the DoJ’s IG hearing regarding the FBI’s (mis)handling of the Hillary email probe were told that no pre-election leaks of a Trump probe occurred. What gives?

Democrats claimed that the FBI’s lead investigator Strzok, now infamous for his pro-Hillary, anti-Trump text messaging (while leading the Hillary probe) didn’t allow his bias to affect either probe (he was also lead investigator in the Trump-Russia investigation).

Throughout the hearing, Democrats noted – if Strzok had allowed bias to affect what he was doing – there would have been a leaked Trump-Russia story…but none occurred.

Is it possible Democrats aren’t aware that October comes before November?

We leave you with this thought…

Congressional Democrats claimed that no leaked Trump-Russia story, pre-election, is proof there was no bias on the part of the FBI’s lead investigator. But the claim is false.

The Oct 31, 2016 NY Times article PROVES that claim is false.

Since we know that claim to be FALSE…that news of a supposed Trump-Russia probe was leaked to the press…by the Democrats’ own standard – it proves a Strzok bias.

And, lest anyone dismiss the leak as merely coincidental…

…just 3 days before that Trump-Russia leak, the NY Times reported FBI Dir. Comey sent a letter to Congress advising Hillary emails were found on a Weiner laptop.

What better way to negate what could be a potentially fatal October surprise for Hillary’s campaign, than to then hit the Trump campaign with an October surprise days later?

Strzok tried stalling the Weiner discovery; when he couldn’t, he leaked the Trump story.

Yeah, yeah…no bias here folks…move along.