You don’t have to go beyond the first page of the Executive Summary at the beginning of the DOJ Inspector General’s report to realize the fix was in on whitewashing Hillary.

If there’s any saving grace at all…if nothing else, considering the report’s a 568-page document, they did everyone a favor by showing their hand on the very first page.

FACT: The IG never interviewed the man in charge – Barack Hussein Obama.

FACT: The IG managed to squeeze in ‘intent’ as a criteria, when it shouldn’t be.

Obama, as president, was in charge of the Executive branch, and even the IG rpt (pg 66) couldn’t ignore the fact his comments at the probe’s onset sent a clear message to those conducting it, saying Hillary just made a ‘mistake’, and no ‘intent’ was involved.

As noted in an IBD article “…while the IG might not have found smoking-gun evidence of political bias in the investigation, the report makes it clear that the entire investigation was biased from the start” (when Obama’s comments set the tone and false premise).

So, the IG noted Obama, everyone’s boss, interfered…but was NEVER interviewed?

Then (still in the first page of the report) the IG notes the “investigation focused on whether Clinton INTENDED to transmit classified information on unclassified systems, KNEW that information included in unmarked emails was classified, or later BECAME AWARE that information was classified and failed to report it.” (caps emphasis added)

As we’ve already noted (here, as well as in previous blogs) the law regarding felonious mishandling of classified data does not require proof of INTENT…just that it was done.

Why bother reading beyond Page i (the first page)? It’s an exercise in futility.

Unless, of course, you’re an aficionado of FARCE…or a Democrat..

…but, then, we repeat ourselves.