Knowing the whole story puts Rep. Gowdy’s comments in perspective

“Gowdy Defends FBI From ‘Spygate’ Accusations”

The Daily Caller lays out the perspective Rep. Gowdy has:  “President Donald Trump has accused the FBI of spying on his campaign, but intelligence officials say they were simply trying to find out the scope of Russia’s attempts to influence the 2016 election. Gowdy seemed to affirm the FBI’s side of the story during an interview”

If that were the whole story, sure.

But when you add the fact a Soros groupee (Mifsud) fed the ‘Russia attempts’ details to a Trump aide, then a Clinton groupee (Downer) prompted remembrance of those details by the aide before then alerting intelligence officials of the conversation, it begs the question – how do they justify an investigation of suspicious acts THEY initiated?

Absent that knowledge…Gowdy’s comments need to be taken with a grain of salt.

Maybe LOTS of grains.

Especially when you consider the Clinton campaign should’ve been investigated too, from their DNC server to their cash collection…and Hillary’s unsecure email activity…

…IF, of course…

…thescope of Russia’s attempts’ were actually a concern.

When ‘scope’ is defined by probing just ONE of the campaigns…IT’S POLITICAL.

PERIOD.

FULL.STOP.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *