If liars were impeachable, D.C. would be a ghost-town…so focus

Remember when Mom used to warn you, “nobody likes a liar..”?

Sadly, elections continue to prove otherwise.

‘Benghazi-Lying’ hasn’t stopped Democrats, or shamed a media that helps them.

But many seem to focus on the wrong issues, and the wrong lies.

Here are the 3 major issues to address, regarding Benghazi failures…

BEFORE

1) What kind of incompetent State Dept. leader would allow funding for non-essential low-priority projects in benign locations (elec car-charging stations in Vienna!), rather than critically essential security for high-priority terror hotspots like Benghazi?

Followup question: what fool would ever again vote for such an incompetent person?

DURING

2) Who is responsible for authorizing U.S. military intervention in other nations, when American lives are threatened by attacking terrorists and host nations won’t/can’t help?

Followup question: if it’s the sole authority of Obama, was he a-w-o-l, or ignored; if ignored, why hasn’t his (now, former) Secretary of Defense Panetta been charged; if a-w-o-l, is Dereliction of Duty a ‘high crime and misdemeanor’, which is impeachable?

AFTER

3) How does Obama justify removing the CIA’s various al-Qaeda references for Benghazi talking points, and inexplicably ADD a never-referenced video as the cause?

Followup question: if the deceitful ‘video smokescreen’ gave cover to al-Qaeda, isn’t that defined as giving ‘aid & comfort’ to America’s enemies…a Treason offense?

****

And remember, what Clinton failed to do in order to ensure the security of her embassy people ‘Before’, is separate from the ‘During’ and ‘After’ failures of Barack Obama.

Remind us again…where does ‘the buck stop’…?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *