Talk about knee-jerk reactions – the tabloid-media reports of an ‘exposed’ email from a Russian nobody, then implies (by extension) illicit efforts at collusion…hysteria ensues:

“Congressional Democrats say Donald Trump Jr.’s emails show collusion and treason“

Forget that no collusion occurred, no evidence exists, and the meeting was abruptly cancelled…all the tabloid-media needs is the dog-whistle and they’re off to the races.

But then, we did mention they’re ‘Democrats’, right?

Does beg an interesting question though.

If a nothing meeting with a nobody that was cancelled as soon as it got started gives Democrats cause for cloth-tearing and raging screams of ‘collusion’ and ‘treason’…

…what about real collusion that Hillary Clinton’s allies openly flaunted with Ukrainian (read ‘Russian’) foreign agents? Or Bill Clinton’s tarmac meeting with AG Lynch?

In the spirit of fairness, can we expect their insistence on prosecuting REAL crimes?