First, does anyone believe Russia would be investigated if Hillary had won?

(Just askin’. Won’t stop the fake-news continuity, but hey…we could hope.)

But Comey’s testimony today revealed his extraordinary views on such things as ‘intent’, where the President’s ‘hope’ is considered to be intent to obstruct…

…but Hillary’s deliberate evasive setup of a private server email system, or her very deliberate destruction of 30,000 emails on said server, could not be seen as intent.

Comey preferred clouds of suspicion, versus the sunshine of truth, and his definition of ‘honest loyalty’ should have brought guffaws of derision from Senate members.

And he may be worrying about whether he was sworn in today, because he testified he leaked his meeting info in defense of Trump’s tweet on meeting recordings…

…but Trump’s tweet came out a day AFTER his leaked meeting info was referenced.

If anyone was unclear on the ‘non-partisan’ nature of former FBI Dir Comey, today’s Senate hearing should have brushed away the fog…he’s as political as it gets.