At one time, President Trump may have had confidence in FBI Dir. Comey, but unable to explain Comey’s multiple lapses in judgment, losing that confidence is understandable.

Losing confidence in someone who finally exceeded a ‘benefit of the doubt’ makes sense.

But how do Democrats explain their sudden regaining of confidence in a man accused of almost single-handedly causing their presidential candidate to go down in flames?

One day, investigating Hillary he has ‘no credibility‘ (with Democrats)…

…but, when fired, suddenly he does, when his investigations might involve Trump?

How can the media spin that hypocritical scenario?

We’re guessing obfuscation.

We only wish Pres. Trump had met with his AG on a tarmac, before firing Comey.

After all, if the media is going to have a hissy-fit, may as well feed the fire, right?