Democrats whining about the Russians hacking the DNC and Hillary Clinton aides’ email are, by that act, conceding that they are LOUSY at national security.

Hacking efforts against both DNC and RNC sites were initiated, but didn’t succeed against the RNC…wonder why sham-stream media doesn’t note the implication?

And why is there no concern voiced about the fact Podesta was a major target that failed to protect information…wasn’t he Bill Clinton’s presidential chief-of-staff?

AND, a counselor to President Obama?

Makes you wonder…was he a lousy security risk while serving in those capacities?

You’d think an objective media would point these things out.

Shouldn’t the real outrage be towards a Party that sucks at National Security?

Just asking…