All the talk of ‘it will cost $93 trillion’ aside, there’s an easier argument against the GND: it’s based on a lie – produced by computer models…and tweaked with ‘adjusted’ data.

• The ‘warming trend’ is based on data deceptively tweaked to reflect it;
• The Middle Ages saw warmer temperatures than exist today;
• The Carboniferous & Jurassic Periods had 4.5x-5x greater co2 levels.

And, surprise…the Earth is still here – as are we.

Animal/plant life flourished during the eras we note above. The sky isn’t falling. (We’d include human life, but Democrats’ infanticide inclinations show that’s not an issue.)

So, why talk ‘costs’? Arguing over mundane details gives credibility to their premise.

The Green New Deal is based on a lie that there’s an earth-ending threat otherwise. It takes just a moment to state, unequivocally, that Science refutes that FALSE threat.

Class dismissed.

“Response rates in telephone surveys have resumed their decline”

Pew Research is reporting that fewer people are willing to participate in polling, and in large part that may be due to the deceptive polling techniques that skew real attitudes.

Oddly enough, their report doesn’t give DISTRUST any thought at all. But the presence of push-polling has become a very real, constant issue, eroding confidence in polling.

This can only work in favor of those who are okay with skewed polling to continue, because they will be the only ones willing to participate in deceptive polling.

Democrats rushing to mics to laud Cohen’s testimony against President Trump bask in a self-righteous glow of ‘I told you so’…even as they ignore one very important fact…

…there wasn’t ONE IOTA of evidence to back up Cohen’s claims.

It shows how desperate they are, to rely on unfounded allegations from a proven liar.

It must be tiring for Democrat supporters, to rally ’round their politicians in the face of so much unfounded lying…even while their own PROVEN wrongdoing is exposed daily.

This Democrat circus couldn’t even produce an endearing clown or performing bear…

…relying instead on a dancing goat.

At the American Thinker: “Ocasio-Cortez freaks out when photographed with chief of staff eating forbidden hamburger” Oops…look who doesn’t buy the Green Deal.

No wonder she ‘freaks out’ but, no worries, girl, you’re in the right Party…

…Democrats are NEVER branded hypocrites.

A headline at the American Thinker “Is a Second Civil War Coming?” gave pause, but in the event such an unlikely event did occur, there’s a bright side for the Right…

…considering the anti-gun rhetoric on the Left…the Right must have all the guns.

Game over.

Democrats play fast-&-loose with ‘tax-the-rich‘ rhetoric, but scream when it happens…

…yet, then, spin it to appear as a GOP tax-cut failure. Reported in the Hill: “Watchdog: Nearly 11 million taxpayers may be subject to limit on key deduction”

Sounds bad, right? O-M-G, 11 million taxpayers are getting screwed by GOP tax cuts!

It takes 8 paragraphs before you learn those 11 million taxpayers are…wait for it…

…the Highest Earners (in primarily high-tax, blue state areas).

That’s right – the Republican tax-cuts capped state and local tax deductions that could be applied against federal taxes; that means high earners, who by definition pay more of state-and-local taxes (SALT), can’t deduct as much as they once could. Cue violins!

Wonder why it took the author to the end of the 8th paragraph to mention that?

(Did we mention The Hill was a left-of-center outlet?)

Could it be Democrats really DON’T WANT TO TAX THE RICH MORE?

Wait – could it be more disingenuous Democrat rhetoric? Say it ain’t so.

As noted in our previous blog, House Democrats are “…using an indicted felon and disbarred lawyer, who lied to Congress, cheated on the IRS, and abused campaign-finance compliance, to question the integrity of a sitting President of the United States.”

Problem is, most of the questions Democrats asked revolve around already debunked theory and conjecture with no basis, no foundation…and Cohen refuted them as well.

Got that? He refuted those allegations today. So, why would Democrats do that?

Because, it gives FakeNews an opportunity to report allegations as if they’re real.

And, you can bet they’ll bury the denials that Cohen gave on those allegations. But, for the ready-to-smear anti-Trump’ers, blaring the questions gives them what they need.

They’ll trumpet the allegations, mute the denials, and then if/when challenged on those denials by Cohen, point out he’s a liar…without noting he was THEIR witness.

That’s how FakeNews works, folks.

Another day, another House committee trolling…errr…hearing, in an attempt to smear the President, but the best the Democrats can do is an indicted liar and felon?

Prediction – Expect lots of noise and fury…and ZERO evidence to back up any claim the just-disbarred (former Trump lawyer) Cohen presents. Oh, and Democrat bloviating.

Seriously – it would’ve been more entertaining to bring in Stormy.

UPDATE: here’s a real shocker…

Democrats limited members to what they could ask of Cohen, but as a House GOP member noted (paraphrasing) ‘…we’re allowed to ask about President’s debts, but Cohen’s lied about his own debts; we’re allowed to ask about the President’s complying with campaign finance laws, but Cohen’s lied about his own compliance; we’re allowed to ask about IRS dealings, but Cohen’s indicted for his own lying IRS malfeasance…

…Mr. Chairman, this is the best witness you Democrats have?’

BOOM!

Seriously: they’re using an indicted felon and disbarred lawyer, who lied to Congress, cheated on the IRS, and abused campaign-finance compliance, to question the integrity of a sitting President of the United States? Honest Americans won’t stand for this.

“Mark Levin: ‘I Support’ Dems Paying ‘Reparations’ to Progeny of Slaves”

In our latest BlueCollar posts we noted the Democrat Party is the slavery Party, and if there are to be reparations, that Party – alone – should be the one footing the bill.

We’re pleased to note the Great One, Mark Levin, now agrees with our position.

“The American people, even way back then, didn’t all own slaves. The American people, even way back when, then, weren’t all supportive of slavery. There was a civil war that was fought, fought between two groups – one group, states’ rights and slavery; another group, federalism and anti-slavery. Now, that’s simplistic, but you get the point.

Now which group is which? Did Abraham Lincoln support slavery? No. Did the Republican Party support slavery? Never. Did the Republican Party support segregation? No. Did the Republican Party support Jim Crow laws in the South? No. Was the Klan an appendage of the Republican Party? No, it was an appendage of the Democrat Party. And every major civil rights bill after the civil war, in the 50s and 60s, was opposed by a significant percentage of elected Democrats and supported by a majority, a significant majority of elected Republicans.” (emphasis added)

Right on, Mark.

The Republican Party began in 1854 on an ANTI-SLAVERY platform, and the first Republican President, Lincoln, saw that platform realized…and he died for it. It would be a travesty of justice to have his Party, and his sacrifice, be obligated to reparations.

Let those who OWN the sin pay for the sin.

Let the Democrat reparations check-flow begin.

Washington Free Beacon: “Dems Defend Infanticide”